
Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order: Why Nations Succeed and Fail
576
Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order: Why Nations Succeed and Fail
576Related collections and offers
Product Details
ISBN-13: | 9781982164799 |
---|---|
Publisher: | Avid Reader Press / Simon & Schuster |
Publication date: | 11/30/2021 |
Series: | Principles |
Sold by: | SIMON & SCHUSTER |
Format: | eBook |
Pages: | 576 |
Sales rank: | 55,377 |
File size: | 37 MB |
Note: | This product may take a few minutes to download. |
About the Author
Customer Reviews
Explore More Items
In this eye-opening, counterintutitive book, economics guru and geopolitical strategist Peter Zeihan predicts the coming breakdown of globalization and identifies who will benefit and who will
The trade in oil, gas, gems, metals and rare earth minerals wreaks havoc in Africa. During the years when Brazil, India, China and the other "emerging
This is a revised edition of the classic book on this subject. It chronicles and examines 170 cases of economic sanctions imposed since World War I. Fifty of these cases were launched in the 1990s
Winner of the 2018 American Academy of Diplomacy Douglas Dillon Award
Shortlisted for the
A brilliant investigation of globalization, the most significant socioeconomic trend in the world today, and how it is affecting everything we do-economically, politically, and culturally-abroad and
The Travels of a T-Shirt in the Global Economy is a critically-acclaimed narrative that illuminates the globalization debates and
This is the eBook version of the printed book.
“The Coming China Wars is a gripping, fact-filled account of the dark side of China’s rise that will be of interest to anyone interested in
We know that our world is undergoing seismic change—but how can we emerge from the crisis a fairer, more equal society?
Over the past two centuries or so, capitalism has undergone profound
Why do nations so frequently abandon unrestricted international commerce in favor of trade protectionism? David A. Lake contends that the dominant explanation, interest group theory, does not